Monday, December 30, 2013

Negative 31 Degrees Fahrenheit



According to the National Weather Service, my location hit negative 31 degrees Fahrenheit for the low during a cold snap. It was negative 31 for only a couple hours in the early morning, but then the highs the following day were not even above zero. The days surrounding had similar lows in the negative 24 to negative 28 degree range. Trailers in my neighborhood were flooding the streets from frozen and cracked pipes. University buildings were suffering frozen pipes. And many other houses in the town had frozen pipes. I didn’t! 

My winterizing work really got tested during this cold snap and it all turned out to be a smashing success. My remake of my heated water hose turned out to be great. It should be good down below negative 40, but hot water came out of my faucet after negative 30, so that’s a major win.
Because of the ultra-cold temps, I did drain my tanks before the snap and pour RV antifreeze into the waste tanks. The purpose of this was to keep the pipes and valves from freezing and splitting. Since the water closet compartment is heated by both the furnace and an electric heater, I wasn’t worried, but wanted to cover all bases. Whether it was necessary to add RV antifreeze, I’m not sure, but my guess is that it didn’t hurt. 

Inside the coach, I was able to keep it at 59 degrees F even during the coldest moments in the night because of the good insulation that this model has and because of my use of both a propane furnace and electric heaters to supplement the propane furnace. My electric heaters were set to their lowest setting and I only use them to spread heat and to keep the furnace from running constantly. At their lowest setting, the two electric heaters consume 725 W. That’s more energy than I would care to admit is needed, but in the grand scheme it’s a tiny amount of energy to heat a house in negative 30 degree F temperatures.  

I made it through the first major cold snap with ease. The problem is that winter had not even arrived when these temps arrived – it was still fall. So, as winter begins and then progresses, we’ll see how many more of those ultra-cold days are still in store. The condition that has me concerned is the possibility of the power going out during a major cold snap. If the power goes out, I have an emergency plan in place, but it will require me to be home for the outage and to recognize the outage in time. In double-digit negative temperatures and a power outage, my heated water hose has about 15 minutes before ice crystals will start forming in the pipe.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Tiny Houses Make the News, RV's Don't

Browsing Facebook, I came across an NPR story, "Architect's Dream House: Less Than 200 Square Feet." The story is about an architect who lost her house to foreclosure and couldn't get another mortgage. She decided to build a "tiny house" by herself and spend only $11,000 on it. Her house is now under 200 square feet. Great idea!

The thing that caught my ear was that she lives in Idaho and said that she didn't live in an RV because RV's aren't built for the climate. I beg to differ.

The tiny house movement is great and it's a step in the right direction for bucking big banks, life-long mortgages, and rent-market ripoffs, but why all the new materials? There are RV's bigger than this lady's tiny house sitting on lots, rotting, all over the country. With a few nifty inventions, the right RV is good down to at least negative 31 Fahrenheit by my experience.

My gripe here is that when people build something resembling a house on a flatbed trailer, it makes NPR. When someone repurposes a Winnebago, people get dismissed as redneck, trailer trash. Is it because people have been re-purposing RV's for decades in situations of individual poverty? Is it because it's now stylish to try to buck the system by living in a tiny house? It seems that there are some class issues and stereotypes at work for how these sorts of lifestyles are covered.

My RV-dwelling choice is rooted directly from the tiny house movement -- I just chose to repurpose something that already existed and was going to just go to waste, rather than building something new with new building materials. Gladly, I won't be making the news, but it sure is odd that the well-to-do build a house on a flatbed and it makes news, but those of us recycling and doing the exact same thing for the same reasons get no such attention -- instead we just get assigned a stereotype.

Here's the article, it's well worth checking out:

http://www.npr.org/2013/12/27/257560971/architects-dream-house-less-than-200-square-feet