Walking A Fine Line

Living in an RV, there’s a fine line that exists between trashy and adventurous. I only suggest this based on the stereotypes I run into and the ways some people seem to think about such a living arrangement. Whenever someone builds a “tiny house” on a flatbed trailer, the internet appears to stand up in applause. Often costing upwards of $30-$40 thousand dollars, tiny housers are often lauded as some kind of hero of the people for going to extremes to escape. When I tell people that I’m “doing the tiny house thing by repurposing a motorhome,” I get varied responses from “wow, that’s really cool!” to “yikes, living on the edge, huh?” The core of the response appears to be rooted in how each person understands financial freedom, responsibility, and the housing system.

Dodging the line between trashy and adventurous isn’t really a problem for me – as a graduate student with a history of successful career choices and an undeniably robust garage of adventure tools, the line itself only exists when meeting people and having to disprove their stereotype. The effect is an uphill battle every time I meet someone and an almost ubiquitous cultural disconnect on why such a lifestyle would have been arrived at in the first place.

Thinking about the cultural norms at work here, I must point out that I am amplifying a minority of reactions in order to make sense of it, but the minority of reactions end up having power. The way some people assume trashiness or dismal poverty can be almost oppressive. Words and reactions to my lifestyle, though infrequent, leave me sometimes feeling the need to prove myself more than I should have to. The reason this reaction comes about is that I find that those who are judgmental or skeptical are often carriers of pernicious stereotypes and are totally unaware of their place in a system that is there to keep them as poor as possible for as long as possible.

Hashing this out is almost ridiculous because I’m talking only about a tiny fraction of the reactions I encounter and the likely presence of discrete reactions that I do not directly encounter. Nevertheless, the presence of shortsightedness and *-isms is an ugly reality.

The reason I find this so fascinating is that dissenters are often in a far worse position than I am, financially, and with their life potentials. I own the roof over my head outright, I own a [real] house that I rent out, and my living expenses are a fraction of even the cheapest apartments. As soon as I start working again, I get to keep an unfair portion of my wages instead of paying for some slumlord’s luxury vacation or fancy car. I can rent an apartment, just like the [imaginary] dissenters, tomorrow and then have an RV to park in some cool place for the weekends.

Though this may be an imaginary problem, I anticipate the presence of such dissent, perhaps in those who know of me but don’t know me. And I must suggest that dissent is based upon a total misunderstanding of the financial system that I have created, the purpose of the system, and the flexibility of the system. This life project is based upon the idea that I am still young enough to unhinge my life, so the next phase can be rooted in security and lack of debt. But it’s hard to communicate these things to those who have never thought about how criminal it is to pay a landlord a “market price” for an apartment or pay endless interest on a home loan. While we will all be subject to these forces for our entire lives (in the middle and lower classes, at least), even in my crazy little situation, some don’t seem to even comprehend why someone would want to minimize their exposure to such a system by going rogue. Why not just pay for an apartment every month, right? Maybe I shouldn’t be so intent on flipping the system, but I am yet unchained and domesticated to the point that I can do this, do it well, and come out ahead. At least that’s the way I see it.